From my point of view this structure of the league is ok...25 games ar not to much..in my opinion 50 would be the corect numer..but 25 it's fine to..Regarding the prizepool i think this is a freerol and we don't buy in so the 250 $ prize pool it;s ok..the minimum numer of the players representing a team is ok..in conclusion the structure of the league is ok

In my opinion structure of this league is good and there is no need to change it, besides this paying structure is pretty motyvating to play good poker.

25 tournaments is enough tournaments for variance to even out.

A mandatory number on a team would be better with maybe top 3 scores on crew countin.

The idea behind the team concept is that people can play with their friends and have fun.

We are not trying to find the ultimate solution from a competitive standpoint.

As such, we are not planning on setting any fixed amount off players per team, or to change anything about how teams work or team scores are calculated.

Me and so arranges, what for to do more if sometimes and these you have not time to play.

It seems to me to make is better a command from 2 to 5 players. The quantity of tournaments is possible and so to leave, the long championship is always more interesting and more intense. To look even now at the table, what struggle has gone. And league be shorter such wouldn't be.

I like how the league is now formed, and the number of tournaments, awards I think are ok, but see what the organizers decide

POKER ? Let's mix a lil'here... Omaha or even better, HORSE? HORSE will give us a break from NLHE. So far we competed in a single game, let's play the other's game...

I for one like the league format here but would be in favor of moving min three per team and as far as number of tournies that is great and i enjoy this league very much as it does give a chance for me to play with alot of freinds.

Constructive criticism is great, but really now...

I came past the midpoint of this Winter league and I have to say that overall, the level of play and graciousness of players has been the best I've experience in any online league.

I joined a one-man team (who has been a consistent no-show) with no hope of making the leaderboard and will apologize to all for my super-loose style. Hopefully I'll be able to get on a team in future leagues where I'll be motivated to scrap it out for for every last position point.

I think structure of this league is good . there is no need to change it.

I think the team format of this league has withstood the test of time and has passed with flying colors.

I do not think anything should be changed .......to be changed is the approach of each player to win!!

I understand the concept in trying to change it for the better but this is just a suggestion, wouldnt it be a good idea if you yourself (GURU) post a forum about ideas and on how to change it and maybe go from there? I persoanlly like the way itssetup besides one thing, and im new here so this really doesnt count for anything, but it would be how the team points are divided. Poker is a competion for everyone, sure its supposed to be fun with friends and family. Thats really all I have to say other than that Im just glad to be aart of it.

I think that the structure of the League very good, long distance, and this adds additional intrigue to the last league tournament, the changes do not always bring positive results. I'm saving it for this structure.
P.S. If possible in the next League, we would like to change start-time of the tournaments.

Well I find it very interesting in participating in such a league.
Can´t wait to play the next league right from the start.

There's always room for change and improvements , but as far as i can see , it's working pretty good and i'm not one to complain anyways . if anything , maybe the time change to say 3 or so , just a thought thou , looking forward to another great season , weeeeeeeeeeeee , lol .

crazzvette

This is my first season and I really enjoyed playing the current structure, but I believe that if any changes should be small "adjustments" because I believe that the current form of dispute and the structure of tournaments like the majority of forum members

I think one change which could be made would be to keep the prize structure same but to increase the places paid from 10 % to 20 %

Basically a normal league, but you can add to the input of tournaments for money. so I think will be interesting, not just the free tournaments

So basically you saying 1st place should be $50 instead $75 for average of 4 hrs. I like it as is. I would rather see buyins and freeroll alternate on the weekends. And monthly leaderboard prizes. Like a heads up match against the admin for the monthly leaderboard. And I would like to see the weekend tourneys on two different sites alternating.

Umm honestly i think $ 50 is not bad at all for 4 hrs of playing considering last time i played in a freeroll for like 4 hours i got only like 22 cents lol There were 600 ppl paid so that format sucks actually maybe we shud just let it be the same as it is but bonus match against admin sounds like fun !!

According to me this good one in himnot too long, it is possible to get to know the adversaries, most though the competitions are taken seriously , there could be change on the registration but answers to me so