International
Open free account
Forgot my password
206 members and 651 guests - online now
Discussion started Signature - 4 minutes ago
Merge Gaming
$5.000
Bonus
+
41%
VIP
US
Independent
US
Winning Poker
US
Independent
$1.100
Bonus
US
Winning Poker
$2.500
Bonus
US
Compete for $5.875 in the Spring Weekend Series III, an exclusive freeroll league hosted by Poker.org!
$150 Freeroll
Starts in 2 days
Carbon Poker
$150 Freeroll
Starts in 3 days
Carbon Poker
Hot & New
Test your skills vs. the clock
with our Turbo Quizzes!
Open free account!
28 year old 2
Iran Iran
MaleMale
6
Joined
September, 2012
Room
Game
Texas holdem
Stake
Big stake
Book
Super system
Hand
9-7 club
Pro
Phill ivey
Last Online
3 months ago
Played Since
2009
Play Style
Super aggressive
Skill Level
High
Hours / Week
35
Biggest Win
300
Biggest Loss
60
Merge making bankroll is much easier than poker stars i think
I hear all the time from usa players that they wish they play on stars,they always say building bankroll is much easier than in poker stars,but i have to dissagree to thatbut why?
1-in poker stars since it has his players by now there is no proper freerolls for building bankroll,let me make an example,there is a well known freeroll on stars called bankrollmob freeroll that is plays 6 time a day that needs pass but it is free,about 4000 or 5000 people battling for about 25 dollars and first prize is 4.5 dollars.i have alot more example in that matter
2.in micro cash tables since people gain hard their money players play very tight,i seen and played in micro tables and u should have hand and good one to win pots.but i should say in low and middle stakes people play more loose and it is easier to play with them .
for instant i played 5 cent 10cent on carbon,played like an hour and from 10 dollar buy in i made 50 dollars in no time,but in poker stars in those blinds player play so much tight that if u buy in for 10 dollars and play perfect for an hour the best u can get is making about 15 or tops 20 dollars,very hard to play
3.in SNGs and multi table if u want to play for big money from 5k garantee up to 100k,u should buy in from 1 dollar up to 11 or 20 dollars and since the players are alot more so the prize is bigger than u think,but the problem is with a such big players pool ur chance of making the finall table where the all money is thinner that u think and with the formula pays people u should be on at least finall table to make proper money that it is not that easy competing with at least 5k up to 50k people .
and finally since u play in a very large pool of players u seen lots of players that make disisions diffrent than others,like how they play and large chunk of players are from eastern that playing with those aggressive not thinker players is harder than u think
and i should mention this at final u see alot more suck out not cause the platform is rigged because the bad player and fishes are more than u can think and lots of time they play bad and got lucky,but in merge players are more play not good but better poker,since they are all american and they know poker better.
finally i should say in high stakes all i was saying going to reverse
Comments
PSST!
You can earn up to
2.5
Club Points by posting a comment!
169
8 months ago
I would have to agree with you hadina....i think merge is easier imo....ps has to many people tryin to fight over no money....hero poker gives away alot of free cash for u to start a bankroll there...just have to pick n choose which games to play when u finally do use the money you win....best thing to do is wait it out and collect as much cash as u can before u fall into playing the money games.....easy way to maintain "and i dont do this" are the double up games.
1535
33
8 months ago
There seems to be more and more opportunity through the Merge network, as time goes on. So many statements you have posted are so very true and most of us need to understand the sites are not rigged.'because the bad player and fishes are more than u can think and lots of time they play bad and got lucky,but in merge players are more play not good but better poker,since they are all american and they know poker better.'Great observations, Hadi.
188
3
8 months ago
Merge is a better network than PS imo for all the reasons you listed and then some. Only downside I can actually think of is if you play 45sngs or the like, they take way too long to fill at this point.

I never liked PS or FTP from day one, and I dont miss either one of them. I would however like to be able to play on a few other networks beyond Merge and Revolution but in due time I suppose.
88
1
8 months ago
Yes but there is no rush poker in merge or revolution if one them can develope a game format as this I wouldnt have much to complain about!
347
232
8 months ago
I would still rather play on PokerStars. I understand that it is harder when there are more people in a tournament to make it to the final table but a lot of those people are not to good so it is easier to place in tournaments more often.
PSST!
You can earn up to
5
Club Points by posting a blog!
Facebook