'Stay aggressive': WSOP limit champ Ian Johns breaks down strategy

Ian Johns at the 2025 World Series of Poker.
Craig Tapscott
Posted on: June 21, 2025 14:34 PDT

Limit hold’em specialist Ian Johns joined an elite group of 49 players who have won four or more WSOP bracelets by winning this year’s WSOP $10K Limit Hold’em Championship.

When it came down to a heads-up battle for the title, Johns was up against the seemingly unstoppable WSOP 2025 juggernaut Viktor ‘Isildur1’ Blom, who has made four final tables halfway through the series but has walked away thus far without the gold. 

“I was playing with Victor from two tables on and he was very impressive,” shared Johns. “I know he doesn't have a background in the game, but he played so well.”

PokerOrg caught up with Johns to discuss some key limit hold’em strategies from one of the world’s best and discover what made Blom such a formidable opponent.


'A good understanding of ranges'

What do you love about Limit Poker so much that’s driven you to become one of the best in the game?

From the moment I started playing poker at 18 years old, the limit game jumped out to me in terms of piquing my interest. I just enjoyed the game more than any other.

It also seemed to be what I was a little better at. I never found no-limit hold’em very much fun. I still don't. When it comes to poker, I want to do what I enjoy. 

What are some limit hold’em strategy keys vs. no-limit that could help a player strive to be a tougher opponent?

One of the most significant differences between the two games is that in no-limit, the money that you put in preflop is disproportionate to the amount that you can win after the flop. 

For that reason, you can be a little more liberal with your starting hands in NLH in certain situations. You can also apply more pressure to your opponents when they have the middle part of their range and make it hard for them to get to showdown. 

In limit poker, there is more emphasis on the starting hand advantage in terms of its importance to success. That’s not to say that you just have to play tight to win because there's a lot more to it than simply that.

For example, if you're constantly taking the T8 against the A-Q in limit hold'em, it's just not going to go very well for you. It's easy for the A-Q to get to showdown on a lot of boards, where the T-8 is not going to be able to apply much pressure. 

Having a good understanding of starting ranges is very, very important, both for you and for your opponent. That's the key tenet in most limit games. 

'A hybrid of aggression' is key to limit success. 'A hybrid of aggression' is key to limit success.

What’s next?

Number two is a hybrid of aggression. It’s about knowing when to value bet somewhat lightly and having a good understanding of the pressure that you can put on your opponents to make them react to you.

It goes hand in hand with proper hand selection. If your opponents know that you consistently have solid preflop ranges, then your aggression after the flop will be given some credibility. 

They're not going to assume that you're out of line or trying to run them over because they know that you're not out of line preflop, which means that following through on that aggression is essential.

Maintaining that aggression throughout can put your opponents on the defensive. I try to ensure that's something I always do.

It allows the aggressor to control the flow of the game, dictate how many bets are going into the pot, etc. My main advice is to stay aggressive and play strong starting ranges. 

Do you have one last key for our readers?

Yes. The other challenging aspect of limit games, to me, is --river play. I feel like so many people throw hand reading out the window on the river.

What happens is they look at the size of the pot and realize they’re getting 8-to-1 odds and call. And sure, there is some merit to that line of thought. However, on some level, you should still be trying to read the hands and play the river well. 

That's where the tiny edges make such a difference when playing amongst the top players versus the elite players. And trying to explore, understand, and execute on those tiny edges is essential. 

Johns is more than comfortable on the main stage, even against Viktor Blom. Johns is more than comfortable on the main stage, even against Viktor Blom.

'I figured he would try to push the boundaries'

What was it like playing against online legend Viktor Blom?

He was the chip leader for almost the entire time from two tables on. He was playing so well. 

I kept waiting to catch him out and find him turn up with some dumb bluff that he wasn't supposed to have. That didn’t happen. He wasn't out of line a crazy amount by any means. I never felt like he was just going to give it away

I'm not saying I expected that because I know he's a great poker player, but I figured he would try to push the boundaries of how aggressively he could play. 

How did you feel when it got down to heads-up play? 

As we continued to play, I became more and more comfortable playing against him. 

I'm just guessing here, but I would guess that he started to sort of respect the way I was playing a little more. And at some point, maybe he took his foot off the gas in subtle ways.

I’ve played so much limit hold’em when we’ve been three and four-handed in my life. I was just trying to figure the match out and stay afloat until I could really hit a stride. And then, luckily enough, it happened.

It seems you had a blast battling Blom.

I did. Victor played excellently. I just didn't see any real mistakes. I watched the stream back, and I was impressed because all the things he did seemed sensible to me. 

I was fortunate enough to hold the right cards and make some correct decisions in some key spots. 

But I enjoyed watching and playing with him. It was really impressive, especially given he doesn't have a lot of experience at limit hold’em.

What do you enjoy most about winning your fourth WSOP bracelet?

Poker has been a significant part of my adult life, particularly in terms of my career. To be successful and relevant for 22 years, since I started playing seriously, is very, very cool. 

Poker's a funny thing because there are a lot of players that haven't had any tournament success, or they just don't play tournaments, but they're incredible poker players. They go under the radar year after year after year.

If I had won zero bracelets, that probably would have been my sort of career arc. But it just so happens that I've been lucky enough to win four now. 

I have to admit, the recognition from my peers that comes with that feels good. No matter how you slice it, no matter how humble you want to be in your life, it feels good when other people see you as a good player.